View Single Post
Old 10-01-2012, 08:17 PM   #33
Fluribus
Guru
Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Fluribus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Fluribus's Avatar
 
Posts: 891
Karma: 8893661
Join Date: Feb 2012
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giggleton View Post
Well I guess we run into problems when we use general meanings then. Let's use a more specific meaning of the term non-ownership. This means that the object in question is owned by everyone. Therefore we all have equal rights to the object.

Extending from one object to all, we cannot take anything because it is already there.
I'm not taking your head. I'm simply disconnecting it from your neck. Or will it require a majority vote.
Fluribus is offline   Reply With Quote