View Single Post
Old 09-22-2013, 04:24 PM   #65
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr ploppy View Post
Criticising books is fine, pitchforking writers (or anyone else) isn't. If someone doesn't like a writer's book, just review that and move on. There's no reason to seek out everything else they have written to leave more reviews, or compile hate pages about them.

A lot of them seem to be about the writer's own character rather than the books they wrote. That's even more useless from a reader's perspective.
You are missing a step here. After a bad review some authors went out of their way to seek out the reviewers in real life and because of that the reviewers decided to warn others about them on GR.

The measures taken by GR don't do anything to authors that decide to go after people who left negative book reviews but stop the reviewers from warning others about them.
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote