I NEVER EFFING SAID TO USE SOFT HYPHENS.
I SPECIFICALLY SAID I DO NOT LIKE THEM.
I SPECIFICALLY SAID THEY VIOLATE THE CONCEPT OF KEEPING LAYOUT AND DESIGN SEPARATE AND I SAID IT SEVERAL EFFING TIMES.
ARE YOU JUST A TROLL LOOKING TO ANGER ME? IT'S WORKING.
THE ISSUE WITH SOFT HYPHENS WAS NEVER THAT I WANTED TO USE THEM.
THE ISSUE IS THAT WHEN READERS DO NOT INCLUDE WHAT HAS BEEN A STANDARD GLYPH SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE INTERNET, HOW CAN I EXPECT THEY WILL INCLUDE OTHER STANDARD GLYPHS LIKE 1/3 AND 2/3 THAT ARE PART OF WGLS4?
WILL THEY HAVE THE U+1F310 GLYPH THAT IS FREQUENTLY USED TO INDICATE A LINK IS TO AN EXTERNAL SITE ON SYSTEMS (LIKE EPUB READERS) WHERE TITLE ATTRIBUTE DOESN'T RESULT IN A TOOL TIP FROM A MOUSE OVER?
I DOUBT IT.
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS FIXATION IS ON NOT EMBEDDING A FONT WHEN USERS CAN TURN OFF PUBLISHER FONTS IF THEY DO NOT LIKE THEM.
AND THE ISSUE WITH THE ABBR TAG IS THAT A USER WHO NEEDS THAT ACCESSIBILITY ISN'T GOING TO BE USING PIECE OF SHIT READER THAT DOESN'T SUPPORT IT, THEY WILL BE USING A READER THAT DOES SUPPORT IT - SUCH AS A WEB BROWSER.
BUT YOU WANT TO DENY THEM THE ACCESSIBILITY FEATURES THEY NEED BECAUSE YOU WANT AN EPUB TO WORK IN A PIECE OF SHIT READER THAT IS TOO STUPID TO JUST IGNORE A TAG IT DOES NOT UNDERSTAND.
YOU WANT TO REDUCE ACCESSIBILITY FOR THE BENEFIT OF CRAPWARE.
HOW THE HELL DO YOU JUSTIFY THAT?
I really am out of here.
Yes, I'm having a meltdown (yes I'm autistic - meltdowns happen when people are completely irrational in their arguments)
I don't like to have meltdowns but I guarantee they will happen again here because certain users are upset that I did not instantly bow at their feet and worship them like gods.
|