Thread: Shouldn't the names of devices be catchier?
View Single Post
Old 08-26-2010, 12:21 PM   #13
ardeegee
Maratus speciosus butt
ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ardeegee's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,292
Karma: 1162698
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-350
Quote:
Originally Posted by queentess View Post
"Honey, have you seen my PRS-300?" Meh. It just sounds stupid. They could at least give it an actual name, not just a code.
Uh, that is the "Pocket." The 600 is the "Touch." The 900 is the "Daily."

Remember, some of the most popular early computers had names like "II", "II+", "IIgs", "64", "Plus 4", etc.
ardeegee is offline   Reply With Quote