View Single Post
Old 07-10-2013, 08:26 AM   #35
crossi
Guru
crossi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crossi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crossi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crossi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crossi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crossi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crossi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crossi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crossi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crossi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crossi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 992
Karma: 12000001
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Seattle Wahington U.S.
Device: kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph Sir Edward View Post
Here you go. A patent is used by a
Copyright does not have that dynamic. A creator of copyright does not gain
If you really want to solve the "copyright problem", tax copyrights. Why not? We tax all other forms of real property...
That's a great idea. If the government is providing a service to a business (the copyright holder) by enforcing copyright protection the copyright holder should pay for the service. Why should they get a free ride and have their business subsidized by the taxpayers. If they are no longer interested in paying for the service they should lose the protection. I don't say the yearly fee should be high but it should not be free. That would solve the orphan works problem.
crossi is offline   Reply With Quote