Quote:
Originally Posted by darryl
But why the very public statement emphasising no payout, the reference to lawyer's advice etc. It is not how these things are usually handled for obvious reasons. We don't know that much. Not even if an internal investigation was carried out. But we do know it hasn't gone anywhere near a courtroom until now. Irrespective of the merits of the matter, B&N deliberately damaged him and he has returned the favour. B&N are now learning why companies don't usually sack people in this type of manner. Even if they are ultimately found to be 100% justified, their investors will still have suffered.
|
B&N still has investors? Desperate people do foolish things.