Quote:
Originally Posted by davidfor
That isn't a bug. If it is, then the width of the indent is also a bug. Both are design decision on where they start. You can disagree with the decision, but, it isn't a bug.
|
I personally consider it to be a bug for a few reasons. For one, the TOC entries are already indented, so what would be the reasoning behind indenting it again using a different method. Next, it is the type of mistake which is easy to do because the depth is numbered starting from 1 (so multiplying it as-is doesn't make the indent start from nothing). In addition, the alignment looks really off with the extra indentation.
Also, why would the width need to be a bug too? Unless I'm misunderstanding you, it's like saying a typo in a book makes the whole book a typo too.