View Single Post
Old 07-18-2009, 11:26 AM   #52
Abecedary
Exwyzeeologist
Abecedary could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Abecedary could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Abecedary could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Abecedary could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Abecedary could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Abecedary could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Abecedary could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Abecedary could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Abecedary could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Abecedary could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.Abecedary could sell banana peel slippers to a Deveel.
 
Abecedary's Avatar
 
Posts: 535
Karma: 3261
Join Date: Jun 2009
Device: :PRS-505::iPod touch:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
The article is not about a publisher pulling out and that publisher's eBooks then being removed from Kindles. It about the illegal George Orwell eBooks being deleted. So can we get it right here instead of going off half-cocked over something that didn't actually happen?
The original articles did not make it clear that the publisher did not have the rights to publish ebook versions of the works, and Amazon's initial comments did not help the situation. When people first asked Amazon about it, they were told that the publisher had "decided" to stop selling those ebooks. Only later did they clarify that the publisher had no rights to sell those books in the first place.
Abecedary is offline   Reply With Quote