Thread: Database Fork
View Single Post
Old 12-17-2013, 03:49 PM   #5
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,422
Karma: 85397180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by devils_add View Post
To some extent yes. The reason is that with the correct redesign of filesystem, Calibre will be able to organize almost everything. Therefore, it will need a more robust metadata.db. In addition, the reason for archiving is that it will allow to create an easy way to transfer items between libraries without having to worry that you will import it wrong and will have to edit metadata again, as everything will be inside that archive.
I'm pretty sure we already have that with the currently working system.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote