|
The article does appear to deliberately set out to denigrate the iPad by being extremely selective in its areas of comparison. That's rather a pointless exercise: one could equally well have made out the iPad to be the vastly superior device by choosing different point of comparison.
Personally I prefer to read a review which is balanced, not one where the reviewer appears to have made up his mind at the outset, and "cherry picks" points to present to back up that opinion. As someone has already said, a review which begins by saying "Amazon's Kindle has always been the best eBook reader on the market" can hardly be considered objective. Best device on the market? Best at what? Good at doing some things - undoubtedly. But simply "best" with no qualification? I must beg to differ.
|