View Single Post
Old 12-26-2017, 08:36 PM   #640
DuckieTigger
Wizard
DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DuckieTigger's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,742
Karma: 246906703
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: USA
Device: Oasis 3, Oasis 2, PW3, PW1, KT
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProDigit View Post
No, I meant 900. Not 600.
And a 100DPI color screen looks worse if it's used as a color screen.
But pixel per pixel, it has the same amount of pixels as a 300DPI eink screen.
If it would display in a similar manner, text on the screen would have subpixel rendering issues.
Your math is way off since you are thinking one dimensional and not two dimensional. A 174 dpi color screen has about the same amount of sub pixel (if you count 3 sub pixel) as a 300 dpi b/w screen. A 300 dpi color screen that has 3 sub pixel is about 519 dpi altogether.

Also worthy of note is that some 300dpi color screens do NOT have 3 sub pixel for every pixel, but less as some sub pixel are shared.

Last edited by DuckieTigger; 12-26-2017 at 08:38 PM.
DuckieTigger is offline   Reply With Quote