MobileRead Forums - View Single Post

eschwartz · 11-15-2015, 06:04 PM

Cool, sounds great!

And I've verified my AUR package passes the plugin tests with flying colors.

A couple requests:

Can you summarize the failed tests -- if any -- at the end? Just to make it easier to read.
Would it be possible to report which components are part of the core functionality, and which are recommended but not crucial? I am thinking of some of the python packages, which plugins may expect but Sigil itself does not use.
Reason I ask is, because I list those as optdepends ("python-whatever: recommended for plugins"), and debian can list them as suggests or recommends.
You documented the plugin in docs/Bundling_Python3_With_Sigil_on_MacOSX.txt but not docs/BuildingOnLinux.md
It isn't very helpful to linux packagers if they don't know it exists so I think it would be nice if you made it more likely they will see it.

11-15-2015, 06:04 PM	#4
eschwartz Ex-Helpdesk Junkie Posts: 19,422 Karma: 85397180 Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)	Cool, sounds great! And I've verified my AUR package passes the plugin tests with flying colors. A couple requests: Can you summarize the failed tests -- if any -- at the end? Just to make it easier to read. Would it be possible to report which components are part of the core functionality, and which are recommended but not crucial? I am thinking of some of the python packages, which plugins may expect but Sigil itself does not use. Reason I ask is, because I list those as optdepends ("python-whatever: recommended for plugins"), and debian can list them as suggests or recommends. You documented the plugin in docs/Bundling_Python3_With_Sigil_on_MacOSX.txt but not docs/BuildingOnLinux.md It isn't very helpful to linux packagers if they don't know it exists so I think it would be nice if you made it more likely they will see it.