Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT
|
having now read that article, i'm all the more stunned that you don't see any interest in addressing the very important points it makes against this law, for instance :
Quote:
A clearly scandalised Jean Dionis du Séjour railed at the poor attendance for this key measure, as, he claimed, just one in forty deputies bothered to turn up for the final debate.
|
Quote:
There is still the small issue of whether the law itself is legal. Nicolas Maubert, an attorney with law firm Gide Loyrette Nouel, has argued that the law might still be challenged by France's judicial body, as blocking internet access could breach constitutional protections guaranteed by the French Constitution.
A further obstacle to the loi Hadopi may yet be the European Parliament, which this week voted to guarantee internet access to all citizens as a fundamental human right.
|
(emphasis mine)
and please note that the Register
also uses the word "suspects" and not "proves".