|
Sorry17 Starson but I have problem as I don't know how to multiple quote your message.
As for looking using a SQLite browser I prefer having timestamps on calibre. Much better !
Also I could agree into not having a single timestamp. I could identify the gap even in this scenario.
>True, but not finding a duplicate doesn't mean you don't have any duplicates,
>and I'm almost always looking for duplicates, not 99.99999999% duplicates.
>QTiny changes in the file mean that I wouldn't get a match with file hash/CRC.
>It's just not a tool I need. If I did need it, I'd use a third party file dupe finder.
> I'm not saying you don't need/want it.
In fact I am not whishing it as the perfect solution for any duplicate. It is the solution for situations where:
1) Calibre crashes in the middle of a batch adding.
2) You import a file which is phisically the same of a previous one.
In all other situations the standard tag based method is ok.
Believe me: today only I have had at least 10 crashes. I am going crazy without hashes.
Regards,
Giuseppe Chillemi
|