View Single Post
Old 03-31-2013, 09:46 PM   #20
cromag
Surfin the alpha waves ~~
cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cromag ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
cromag's Avatar
 
Posts: 24,301
Karma: 459220161
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Jersey
Device: Jetbook Lite & Mini, Nook STR, Kobo, Hanvon N516, Kindle 2, Androids
Linux is (very, very closely) based on UNIX. As an old Bell Labs guy I love it!

I run Windows (reluctantly) on my desktop since there is one program I use that does not have a good Linux alternative -- Diamond Cut software for restoring and editing audio files.

My netbook runs Ubuntu, a Linux "distro" (distribution -- the underlying Linux is nearly identical among most major distros -- the user interface, desktop, etc. vary).

I don't have experience with Windows 7 or 8, but the Windows systems I'm familiar with will happily run anything that ends in .exe, .bat, or any one of many other file extensions without ever even mentioning it to the user. This is a little like a kid who happily runs up to every stranger he meets and asks for candy.

Linux doesn't need file extensions, and generally needs you to tell it to run something before it will run it. Even then, it won't even allow you to run something that will make system-wide changes without prompting you for the system password. That's the first hurdle a malware writer has to jump.

Next, different operating systems will use the same hardware very differently. A virus written for a computer running Windows cannot affect that same computer running Linux. So, malware writers would have to write twice as many viruses to cover the field. It's generally not worth it -- too many people and businesses are happy to run the computer they bought and never mess with the OS. (The big exception to this is for network servers, which make great distribution systems and where a significant percentage run Linux based Apache software. It's still pretty tough to do, though.)

When my daughter started using her computer for homework assignments, back when she was in 5th grade, I wiped Windows from an old desktop and installed Ubuntu. Sure enough, one of the sites she was directed to for a homework assignment ran an infected banner ad. She flew into a panic. The ad used Javascript to hijack her browser (Javascript on Linux runs anything that Javascript on Windows runs), and popped up a fake alert that she had malware installed and a fake virus scan. However, the real malware payload DID NOT INSTALL. She got panicky and asked me to help. I pointed out that Linux does not call it's hard drive C:, that she didn't have any of the Windows specific directories, dlls, etc. Closing the browser solved the problem. It worked fine when she opened the browser again.

To test-drive Linux get a Live CD or download. It will run the Operating System from RAM and it will not mount your hard drive, so you cannot affect anything there -- unless you choose to install. There are tons of very professional home and office software available, most free, including office suites, music and videos, Skype, etc.

I've attached screenshots of my daughter's fake attack. Her computer had no infection but some of her classmates, running Windows, got nailed.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot-2.png
Views:	145
Size:	196.1 KB
ID:	103744   Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot-3.png
Views:	132
Size:	195.9 KB
ID:	103745  
cromag is offline   Reply With Quote