View Single Post
Old 06-15-2018, 01:36 PM   #63
vrf
Addict
vrf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vrf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vrf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vrf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vrf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vrf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vrf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vrf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vrf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vrf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.vrf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 218
Karma: 1300000
Join Date: Dec 2004
Device: Oasis 2, Voyage, Paperwhite 2, Kindle Touch, Kindle Keyboard, iPad Pro
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant View Post
The current samples, while lower resolution (202ppi vs 300ppi) have higher contrast and much greater reflectance (80ish vs 40ish)

And a much faster refresh rate.

Are those claimed numbers for the video display in this thread? Because while the reflectance and contrast numbers sound impressive, it appears the viewing angle is limited for achieving those levels. It looks more like a specular sort of reflectance, not a matte, wide-angle viewing like paper (or E-ink).
vrf is offline   Reply With Quote