View Single Post
Old 09-25-2007, 07:35 AM   #24
jasonkchapman
Guru
jasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it isjasonkchapman knows what time it is
 
jasonkchapman's Avatar
 
Posts: 767
Karma: 2347
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Device: Sony Reader, nook, Droid, nookColor, nookTablet
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcCunney View Post
Which may be beginning to happen. But it leads to a thorny question.
I agree, but it's a market question, with a market solution. Book contracts will shift and twitch for a while and then settle back in around some kind of "norm". Authors and agents are already paying attention to e-rights. They have been since Tasini v. NYTimes. They'll just have to do some tweaking to the rights reversion clause. Personally, I don't think anything makes sense but a strict time limit for e-rights.

Print rights have a built-in milestone that the publisher has to cross to keep a book in print, that being another print run. That milestone requires a certain level of commitment from the publisher. E-rights don't have one, and the old phrases like "substantial effort to promote and sell the book" just don't make sense in e-.
jasonkchapman is offline   Reply With Quote