View Single Post
Old 07-07-2010, 12:02 PM   #19
Maggie Leung
Wizard
Maggie Leung beat Jules Verne's record by 5 days.Maggie Leung beat Jules Verne's record by 5 days.Maggie Leung beat Jules Verne's record by 5 days.Maggie Leung beat Jules Verne's record by 5 days.Maggie Leung beat Jules Verne's record by 5 days.Maggie Leung beat Jules Verne's record by 5 days.Maggie Leung beat Jules Verne's record by 5 days.Maggie Leung beat Jules Verne's record by 5 days.Maggie Leung beat Jules Verne's record by 5 days.Maggie Leung beat Jules Verne's record by 5 days.Maggie Leung beat Jules Verne's record by 5 days.
 
Posts: 1,449
Karma: 58383
Join Date: Jul 2009
Device: Kindle, iPad
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
Plus their expectations on wages and working conditions are changing.
It's no longer enough to *have* a job; they now aspire to something noticeably better than slave labor conditions. There's more to life than subsistence and as the chinese economy improves so do its citizens' aspirations.
That is the implied deal in the whole cheap-labor "developing nation" economic model; one generation sacrifices so the next won't have to. Well, China is reaching the Next Generation. And they, reasonably, believe they deserve better.
(About time, too.)

The cheap-labor ramp to economic development isn't quite played out yet, but if none of the countries that could reasonably benefit from the emerging opening take advantage, we'll likely see a new wave of automation-based cost-reduction like we saw in the 80's before mainland China opened up.

It's not a given, though; if the world economy softens again (likely, actually) there won't be demand for extra product *or* capital for the automation investment. A bigger (and more proximate) threat than a cheap-labor shortage is a capital shortage.
Yes. Nothing certain as things develop, but I agree with what you're saying in broad strokes.

As it happens, I expect things to get really ugly with the world economy. I'd really prefer to be wrong about that.
Maggie Leung is offline   Reply With Quote