View Single Post
Old 07-02-2010, 08:51 PM   #21
tponzo
Addict
tponzo doesn't littertponzo doesn't littertponzo doesn't litter
 
Posts: 239
Karma: 237
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: OH USA
Device: Sony PRS 900(gave it to my sister); Sony PRS-T1; onyx book note air
Quote:
Originally Posted by Worldwalker View Post
The term "sci-fi" has long been considered pejorative. Some people use it today without realizing that, but to many long-time fans, it's highly insulting both to the genre and to the people who enjoy reading it. "Sci-fi" is a term applied to hokey, Buck-Rogers-y, often juvenilistic, trash. (come to think of it, the Sci-Fi Channel might have named itself very aptly)

"Sci-fi" is neutral to people who don't understand its past and context, and highly insulting to those who do. Depending on who you're talking to, it can be almost the "n-word" of science fiction fandom. "SF" is neutral to everyone. Why insult people when you don't have to?
Interesting. I've been a science fiction/fantasy reader for decades (btw love David W., looking forward to reading the new HH) and used to work in a book store. Never heard this before from any of my "geek" friends. Wouldn't have a clue if you said SF. (And anyway I like Buck Rogers, lol).

I do know that many people are insulted by the stuff that gets classified as sci-fi/fantasy which is really neither - not every book which takes place in the future is really "speculative fiction" Of course the lines between genres are really starting to be blurred these days.

Last edited by tponzo; 07-02-2010 at 09:07 PM.
tponzo is offline   Reply With Quote