Thread: Philosophy: books and discussion
View Single Post
Old 06-28-2010, 07:39 PM   #550
WT Sharpe
Bah, humbug!
WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
WT Sharpe's Avatar
 
Posts: 39,072
Karma: 157049943
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA, USA
Device: Kindle Oasis, iPad Pro, & a Samsung Galaxy S9.
Does anyone think philosophy could benefit by having popularizers in the way scientific knowledge has become more widespread through the efforts of folks like Sagan, Gould, Hawking, Asimov, et al.? And would any professional philosopher who attempted to make philosophy available to that masses suffer the same fate as the scientists who are belittled by their colleagues for their efforts to bring scientific literacy to the masses?
Last edited by WT Sharpe; 06-28-2010 at 07:42 PM.
WT Sharpe is offline   Reply With Quote