View Single Post
Old 06-27-2010, 02:02 AM   #60
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by omk3 View Post
I know about that but transliteration can never be entirely accurate, especially if there is no equivalent in the second alphabet. Is there a letter for the "th" sound in the latin alphabet?
You are absolutely right, of course, but it does have its uses. Eg, it's through transliteration that we know that a "C" is Latin was always "hard", because wherever "C" occurs in a name in Latin we always have a "kappa" in Greek, never a "sigma".

No, there is no "th" sound in Latin.

Quote:
Things like pitch or vowel length probably couldn't be successfully transcribed either. Omikron (ο) and omega (ω) actually mean little o and big o, so there must have been a big difference in how they sounded. Do you know what that difference is supposed to be?
I believe it's not the case in modern Greek, but for Attic Greek I was taught that omicron is a short "o", as in "pot", whereas omega is the long vowel sound in "saw".
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote