View Single Post
Old 06-25-2010, 02:15 PM   #94
tompe
Grand Sorcerer
tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
Quote:
Originally Posted by astra View Post
If I understand correctly, he says that there is very high tax if you earn more than a certain figure.
For example:
If you eran 15K pa., the tax is 20%, so you pay 3K
If you earn 40K pa., the tax is 30%, so you pay 12K
If you earn 51K pa., the tax is 40%, so you pay 20K
If you earn 100K pa., the tax is 50%, so you pay 50K

However, if the percentage was the same 20% for everybody, then people who earn would not have to find ways to hide their income.
Why? The opinion that the percentage must be the same regarding of the income seems arbitrary to me. I do not see how you can use an argument that makes it OK for high income persons to avoid taxes that cannot be applied to a lower income. A rights based argument would be applicable independent of income level for example.
tompe is offline   Reply With Quote