Quote:
Originally Posted by pietvo
(10 doesn't apply to this case).
The way I read this is that it is allowed to collect copies in a `library', if not for commercial purposes, and second that the copies may be made available only for scientific purposes and not commercial. I think in the original case the copies were also made available for general purposes, not only for scientific ones. I think that makes a big difference. Unless you can convince a judge that reading a book is a scientific exercise. Maybe a good lawyer can convince the judge.
|
Here is the original, Allowed without permission from the copyright owner is:
Quote:
|
9. (изм. - ДВ, бр. 99 от 2005 г., в сила от 10.01.2006 г.) възпроизвеждането на вече публикувани произведения от общодостъпни библиотеки, учебни или други образователни заведения, музеи и архивни учреждения, с учебна цел или с цел съхраняване на произведението, ако това не служи за търговски цели;
|
My translation:
Quote:
|
reproducing of already published works by public accessible libraries, <sum name for schools, universities, etc.> and other educational institutions, museums and archiving institutions, with educational purpose or with the purpose of preservation of the work, if this doesn't serve commercial goals.
|