View Single Post
Old 06-19-2010, 07:06 PM   #63
MikeConn
Junior Member
MikeConn knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'MikeConn knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'MikeConn knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'MikeConn knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'MikeConn knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'MikeConn knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'MikeConn knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'MikeConn knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'MikeConn knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'MikeConn knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'MikeConn knows the difference between 'who' and 'whom'
 
Posts: 4
Karma: 10000
Join Date: Jun 2010
Device: none
As far as I'm aware, Microsoft has never tried to legislate for the moral standards of those using its products. Their corporate megalomania isn't an attractive trait, but it's far less dangerous than the pious, Big Brother tendencies of Apple. Apple sell sexy gadgets, manufactured in the kind of working conditions even George Orwell could hardly have imagined. Who are they to dictate what I can read or watch?

The more I learn about this company, the more I'm glad I have a Nokia phone and Windows on my computer.
MikeConn is offline   Reply With Quote