Thread: Fair Use?
View Single Post
Old 06-16-2010, 09:02 PM   #53
Rich_D
Fanatic
Rich_D ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rich_D ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rich_D ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rich_D ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rich_D ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rich_D ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rich_D ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rich_D ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rich_D ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rich_D ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rich_D ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Rich_D's Avatar
 
Posts: 581
Karma: 1314896
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA USA
Device: Android phone, Kobo Glo HD, nook ST with Glo (backup)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Fitzgerald View Post
Copyright infringement is stealing. Infringement means accessing something you do not have the right or permission to access. Trying to parallel that to jaywalking and murder is ludicrous unless you were going for comparing the severity of the offense. Again, because you don't see the value of something doesn't exonerate you. It still doesn't matter if something if something you take actually doesn't have value (not likely or you wouldn't want it), if you you take something that doesn't belong to you, you are a thief. And just because you are getting away with it doesn't make it right.
It isn't stealing, but it is Copyright infringement. If I steal a book from you, you no longer have possession of the book, I do. If I copy it - we both now possess the book. Both are illegal, but not the same crime.

By your logic, if I lend my books to a friend, that person is stealing from the author and I guess I would be an accomplice.
Rich_D is offline   Reply With Quote