Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon
Quite apart from it being a new account punting for another sub-standard, badly designed blog, this nonsense is getting old. The "cloud" movement being pushed to take away even our current minimal rights by a certain sub-section of the corporatist movement is foundering, and rightly, on users wanting at least some degree of control over their purchases.
The "cloud" is great for processing, but lousy for privacy, backups, offline working and any number of other issues which actually concern users. The way forward is Baens, not stripping user's rights further and demanding they be online to read!
kjk - People will pay rental prices for a rental. Or rather, if the prices are not rental, the darknet benefits.
|
First - Not sure why DawnFalcon resorts to insults. I'd like to see your well-designed blog before you start hurling those around. Please include a link in your response.
On the your more relevant comment - the cloud movement isn't being pushed due to some dark conspiracy to take away your rights. Cloud computing is, quite simply, a large-scale shift of computing away from desktop and single-server centric to abstracting the compute towards multiple, virtualized instances that is an order of magnitude more efficient than the way computing has worked in the past.
From a consumer standpoint, pervasive broadband has allowed more content to be stored in the cloud, and the move to HTML5 enables offline caching so you aren't cut off from your content when, if by chance, you're cut off to your broadband. Read up on HTML5 (better yet - if you used Google Gears, which is being replaced by HTML5 by Google for their offline caching), and you'll see you aren't "required to be online to read".
Again, much better deal, something most consumers would agree with.
Dark conspiracy theories aside, pushing content into the cloud the future, might as well embrace it.