Quote:
Originally Posted by beppe
In my post I use measure in a mathematical sense. It has nothing to do with instruments.
Then if you take it literally you are open, as I just gave you examples, to any tricky ambiguity. And prey of all the false prophets that abound.
One worse thing.
Your statement is DOGMATIC.
I am sure that that is not what you wanted.  |
There are no prophets, we can only know what we can know. We have to do the best we can and that is science and the scientific method upon which it is based. Anything other than that is potentially false.
Math is science.