View Single Post
Old 06-14-2010, 04:42 AM   #113
jbjb
Somewhat clueless
jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 780
Karma: 10535853
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by m-reader View Post
Do you *really* think that iPad is much better than a high-end HD Sony LCD/Plasma TV for watching movies? If that's so you should probably re-think.

Doesn't make sense, does it? Well, this is what your post sounded like.

And yes, I have owned an iRex device and I have tried an iPad, and yes again, I found iRex to be much better for reading.
Perhaps I didn't express myself very well.

I read your post as a blanket claim that the iPad's technology is mediocre, and that iRex's is far superior, and that iRex's failure and iPad's success were an injustice of marketing.

You may prefer reading on the iRex (as it happens I find reading on the iPad a very good experience, much better than my PRS-505), but that's not the point. You may find the iRex's technology more suited to your particular wants, but a blanket claim that it's far superior seemed unwarranted.

/JB

Last edited by jbjb; 06-14-2010 at 04:44 AM.
jbjb is offline   Reply With Quote