View Single Post
Old 06-08-2010, 12:48 PM   #126
beppe
Grand Sorcerer
beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beppe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 5,161
Karma: 81026524
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Italy
Device: Kindle3, Ipod4, IPad2
Quote:
Originally Posted by WT Sharpe View Post
It's my understanding that Newton's Theory of Gravity is so accurate in it's predictions that it's still used for spaceflight. If we ever become an interstellar species, the greater accuracy of Einstein's Theory will prove invaluable, but for playing around in our own backyard, Newton's the guy. That isn't to say that Relativity never comes into play. GPS systems, for example, would quickly get out of whack if it's effects weren't taken into account.
Well I am talking about apples falling. To predict exacty where they will fall you need to know at least:

a) detailed knowledge of mass distribution underground
b) detailed and actual state of air between end points
c) complete and accurate description of shape and surface properties of the said apple
d) detailed and accurate description of the detachment of said apple from branch of tree.

Are you Mandrake, my friend?

or you can do assumptions ...
beppe is offline   Reply With Quote