View Single Post
Old 06-03-2010, 02:15 AM   #21
rogue_librarian
Guru
rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rogue_librarian's Avatar
 
Posts: 973
Karma: 4269175
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Europe
Device: Pocketbook Basic 613
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iphinome View Post
Since I object to thief in the copyright argument i can't sit and let you apply it to someone here. Scammer would work I think.
Surely "scam" is just a colloquial expression for the act of fraud?

Quote:
I think someone else made a case for fraud though I'm not sure it technically meets the definition.
That would have been me, I think. One common definition of fraud is "an intentional deception made for personal gain or to damage another individual". Surly this case fits that bill.
rogue_librarian is offline   Reply With Quote