View Single Post
Old 06-02-2010, 07:19 AM   #85
rogue_librarian
Guru
rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rogue_librarian's Avatar
 
Posts: 973
Karma: 4269175
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Europe
Device: Pocketbook Basic 613
Quote:
Originally Posted by HansTWN View Post
Sharpness in expression is just the point. "Copyright violation" has lost its edge
I am sorry if it doesn't serve your agenda as well, it's still the expression that's routinely used by professionals, law makers and, in fact, common terminology (or should be, at the very least). I see no reason to use anything else.

Quote:
since nowadays many tend to think that copying an author's work without his or her consent is fine
Are you seriously arguing that's because we're not calling it theft?

Quote:
So, lacking a more suitable expression ...
Ah, but we don't, see? We got a perfectly suitable expression.

Quote:
If you can coin a new phrase, that accurately expresses that such copying is harming the authors and that it is wrong, be my guest.
I quite like the example of "mind rape" somebody came up with a little earlier... Kidding.

Last edited by rogue_librarian; 06-02-2010 at 07:22 AM.
rogue_librarian is offline   Reply With Quote