Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich_D
I don't believe that's the issue with the situation in the OP. The veteran doesn't own the property. We have freedom of speech in this country, but if someone posts a flyer or sign on my property and I don't agree with it, I have the right to take it down. If I want to fly a flag on my property, I have the right, unless I signed that right away by agreeing to an associations rules.
I don't agree with their rule, but the property owner has the right to say not to fly a flag and I certainly don't want the government stepping in changing that.
In the case in question - the owners were swayed by public opinion to change the rule.
|
Having spent half of my rather long (so far) life in the defense of my country (23 years in active duty in the US Navy, and ten years as a Dept. of the Army Civilian), I proudly display my national symbol whenever appropriate, I have even had a license plate with a US flag on it. I also stand and salute during the playing of the National Anthem and the passing of the Colors.
That being said, it has been my observation that many people do not understand that the constitution protects the people from the Government, not the other way around. Private individuals and organizations are not bound by the constitution, and may impose any lawful rules they see fit.
So, this is NOT a first amendment issue, it is a failure of our legislature to properly word existing legislation protecting the right to display the flag so that it includes renters.