|
It seemed to be until I tried to read the "Symbolic Speech" portion.
Ardeegee, I do believe that you are correct on that. I however I do believe that the supreme court had a ruling about certain outrageous clauses in a contract that make said contract void (such as your asparagus example). I don't have any proof of this, but I'm looking. Its just something that I think I remember from a government class I took.
|