View Single Post
Old 09-01-2007, 07:48 AM   #19
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate the great View Post
The company who put its name on the product and sold it to me gets the blame. It may not be their fault, but that doesn't matter. Sony was responsible for QA to make sure the user wouldn't be damaged.
I'm sorry, Nate, but I completely disagree with you.

If I buy a program from a 3rd party, then I am not responsible for doing "QA" on that software - that's the responsibility of the company which produces the software. By your argument, if I buy any piece of software and find a bug in it, then it's my fault for not doing QA on the software? I'm afraid that sounds completely irrational to me!

It's one thing to blame someone for something which is their fault, but quite another to blame them in a situation in which they appear to be no more than an innocent victim of "blunders" made a third party.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote