View Single Post
Old 09-01-2007, 07:26 AM   #17
Nate the great
Sir Penguin of Edinburgh
Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Nate the great's Avatar
 
Posts: 12,375
Karma: 23555235
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: DC Metro area
Device: Shake a stick plus 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Hi kacir,

I am a software author myself. If I licenced a 3rd party DRM package for use on my software CDs in good faith, who would you blame if the DRM messed up your computer? Me, or the company who produced the DRM software? Doubtless I would be legally responsible, since it was my software that you bought, but could I really be "blamed" for it?

Isn't this the situation with Sony? That they licenced this DRM package in good faith from another company? One may disagree with their decision to impose DRM on music CDs (I certainly don't think it's a good idea), but is it really Sony's fault that it all went horribly wrong?

Don't you think that you might be blaming the wrong people for this?
The company who put its name on the product and sold it to me gets the blame. It may not be their fault, but that doesn't matter. Sony was responsible for QA to make sure the user wouldn't be damaged.
Nate the great is offline   Reply With Quote