View Single Post
Old 05-27-2010, 07:47 AM   #182
rogue_librarian
Guru
rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rogue_librarian's Avatar
 
Posts: 973
Karma: 4269175
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Europe
Device: Pocketbook Basic 613
Quote:
Originally Posted by HansTWN View Post
In that case it would be called "copy privilege".
I am not playing your game of semantics here, sorry. Copyright refers to "the right to make or sell copies", something that you wouldn't have to grant explicitly if the creator simply "owned" his work outright. That said, the English name given to a universal concept is hardly a swaying argument.

Quote:
Actually it is authors who are granting fair use exceptions to society.
Well, no, but let's keep it at that. You're entitled to your point of view, as senseless as it might appear to others.

Quote:
The author has created the work, by natural law it is his.
Just one final request: please don't use the well-established term "natural law" in your own, special way.
rogue_librarian is offline   Reply With Quote