Thread: Court Rules That File-Sharing Service Infringed Copyrights
View Single Post
Old 05-25-2010, 06:21 AM   #258
mr ploppy
Feral Underclass
mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mr ploppy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
mr ploppy's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,622
Karma: 26821535
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Yorkshire, tha noz
Device: 2nd hand paperback
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaime_Astorga View Post
I think the problem DRM is trying to solve can be stated as "prevent unauthorized copying and distribution of books/songs/movies" (where the limits for authorized copying are left to the sensitives of the person in question). Does anybody object to this definition? And, if so, how do you think it should be modified?
There is also the problem of people trying to access content on unauthorised playback devices. Barnes & Noble books on a Kindle, for example.
mr ploppy is offline   Reply With Quote