View Single Post
Old 05-25-2010, 01:11 AM   #252
mvisconte
pHilosopher kIng
mvisconte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mvisconte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mvisconte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mvisconte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mvisconte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mvisconte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mvisconte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mvisconte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mvisconte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mvisconte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mvisconte ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
mvisconte's Avatar
 
Posts: 208
Karma: 429751
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: An imperfect world
Device: Laptop, laptop, desktop, phone (HTC, HTC, Asus, Asus, LG rah!)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon View Post
Well, you've just called your grasp of the issues sub-childlike. Which I fully agree with you is entirely accurate.
Bwa ha ha ha... now which of your imaginary friends told you to say that?


Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon View Post
Oh look, you're making a fool of yourself ....
You needed company.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon View Post
And what is my kind, precisely? In the interests of you demonstrating how wrong you can be?
Uh... foolish? Now, you can't prove me wrong, you've presented too much evidence to the opposite.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon View Post
Well, at least I'm not funny in the head like you.
The jury is still out on that. Nope, sorry. They're back. Guilty.


Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon View Post
According to your constitution, erm...no.
erm. What?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon View Post
You're supporting a law which is going to land a lot of them in entirely unnecessary legal trouble. So... no, you're just lying. One way or another.
Silly wabbit. You may or may not be lying, but you are confused. And, just to be clear: I don't care. I didn't care about the snail darter and was pulling for the farmer that is was bankrupting. I am pulling for the citizens in AZ.


Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon View Post
Again, what "sort" am I? (Hint: my basic political philosophy is one I share with Lincoln and Jefferson)
What "sort"? Well, so far, "the peculiar sort". Hint: Don't really care.

But just in passing regarding the philosophy that you share with Lincoln, is that the one where he represented a slave owner trying to get his slaves back, the one where he was willing to prevent the feds from interfering with any states that were slave-owning states, the one where he forbade his generals from freeing slaves in captured territories, that says that "blacks will never be equal and can't live on the same continent as whites"? Strange, that doesn't sound like you, but whatever.

No, wait, to be fair, I should apply your ... logic. If some of the words sound familiar, it's because they came from your lips/tips:

a) Thanks for proving just what an obtuse nut you are...
b) but your attacks rather than your logic are telling... us that you really are confused...
c) you are breathing your own histrionic crap and I am afraid that it is doing you no good. I certainly think it stinks, but some people like that.
d) I have not and will not take any position on your apparant lack of cogent thought, although it is pretty sad and it makes it hard to hold useful conversation... Oh wait, that was a position.
e) And we find out that you know precisely NOTHING about the actual issues, only your own delusional self-righteous view. Which is not really a surprise!
f) there really isn't an "f".
g) "Yes, you and your kind."
h) "And again, you evidently haven't heard that" it's none of your business. Hm... shouldn't you be whining for civil rights in China or changes to immigration laws in Mexico?
i) You haven't called for my head on a spit yet, for which I thank you, but I can't think that it's too far off.
j) No "J", either!
k) You don't really know how to debate, but you're fun at ad hominem attacks, insults, non-sequitur, or perhaps ADD.
l) Your little view is not even black and white, just murky, inky... nothing. I prescribe ice cream, chocolate, prn. STAT! if you prefer.
m) this list is getting pretty long isn't it?
n) isn't it?
o) Oh my, this makes as much sense as your single-minded myopia.
p) I'll brb.
q) Ah... where were we?
r) Oh wait, the Amazon was the Pirate. Hubba-hubba
s) "r" and "s" sound like "arse"
t) for two
u) are a silly person
v) Joe Arpaio? Really? Are you sure you don't mean Scott Baio? I heard that HE "Deliberately had at least two people killed and one paralysed for life, yes." I personally would not say it, because without specific proof, it would be libal, and I'm liable to get in trouble.
w) Are you still with us? Hey! Us! Are YOU still here? (yeah, we're here. We're at the bar.) Good ol' "Us".
x) This is where the naughty bits go.
y) don't you move to Arizona. I know they would welcome you. They're wonder people; except for the gangs, drug runners, extortionists. sex offenders, drunks, violent malcontents, and murderers. Normally it's not that bad, but lately the malcontents have refused to carry their illegal alien identification cards, preferring black-market stolen IDs.
z) your ability to be warm and engaging as an introduction to interesting, useful, and spirited intercourse is somewhat lacking. It could be that you weren't aware of that as an option, or perhaps don't have the social skills to carry on logical discourse, or maybe you're just ornery.


But seriously, Jefferson was twice the man you'll ever be.
mvisconte is offline