|
I have e-subscriptions to all three and have been reading them off and on for decades. Analog is actually the oldest, not F&SF, being founded in 1930 as Astounding and published continously since a brief gap in the early 30's. It aims at a fairly narrow band of traditional SF readers. All the stories revolve around some aspect of technology, and tend to be straightforward in terms of narrative style. It tends to have the most consistent reading experience of the three-- and publishes the kind of stories people think of as "classic American SF." Robert Sawyer's novel "Rollback" was recently serialized in Analog. It's where you'll find the "technical stories" where someone has a problem and the story focus is on how the problem is resolved as much or more than character growth. It's also the only one of the three that serializes novels, usually before publication in book form.
F&SF is the second oldest, starting in the fifties. It has the widest variety, publishing fantasy as well as SF. I find it has works that are more character and style driven than Analog. It's hard to characterize F&SF stories, but there aren't a lot of nuts & bolts style SF pieces, as it has more of a literary flavor. Look for contemporary fantasy more than sword and sorcery here.
Asimovs' is the new kid on the block, starting in the late seventies. It's published by the same people as Analog, but has a different editorial style. They tend to publish what they call serious and thoughtful character driven fiction. Essentially their stories focus more on the soft sciences than Analog, and are primarily about character change. If there's a technical problem, the story is much more on how it affects character than how it's solved technically.
|