Quote:
Originally Posted by kindlekitten
I can't really go into how and why I have this information, ya'll just have to bear with me... (and really folks, I'm not big on big oil etc., I am however big on the truth)
BP wanted that platform MUCH closer to shore. the reason being, that they were concerned and DID communicate that having the platform at those depths would make containment of any breaks incredibly difficult if not impossible. due to much pressure of environmentalists, they were forced to go out to the depth they are.
something to think about when attaching the blame. not my point of view, just sharing a conversation I had with someone in the know
|
They could have chosen not to drill at all if the hazards were deemed to great. They did not. And here we are, regardless of what could have been.
What you are saying is that they drilled knowing the risk... not really a defence argument for BP is it?