View Single Post
Old 08-27-2007, 12:34 PM   #71
NatCh
Gizmologist
NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
NatCh's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,615
Karma: 929550
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Republic of Texas Embassy at Jackson, TN
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3
Quote:
Originally Posted by nekokami View Post
I'd still say stiff paper would be better than plastic, though. Plastic is more durable, sure, but not biodegradable.
I see where you're coming from, nekokami, and I don't disagree, however, I view books as things I don't want to biodegrade.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nekokami View Post
With regards to the Harry Potter ebooks, I haven't seen an actual quote by Rowling that she nixed the idea. As far as I've been able to tell, it was her publishers who didn't want to do it.
I haven't seen any such quote either, but I have seen e-books by Scholastic ... is that not the publisher? Perhaps they're just an affiliate or something?
NatCh is offline   Reply With Quote