Agreeing with me is an excellent way to get me to think you're a genius, jasonkchapman!
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonkchapman
... a logo is simply supposed to be basic symbology that suggests a meaning.
|
That is a really important point, I think. If we get too complex, we lose the point of the logo: something which is quickly and clearly recognizable as being "of MobileRead."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemurion
I like Steve's MRlogo3-- the screen with the buttons and shadow. I prefer it to the second one because keeping the arrows on the right keeps them out of the shadow and makes them more distinct. It also helps that it represents text, but does not show any as the mock-latin used in place of text can be annoying.
|
The mock latin is interesting (though I still favor the binary to text thing, personally -- they're not incompatible, I suppose), but I don't really like the arrows.
I
really like the stylized hand, for exactly the reasons that jasonkchapman noted (though I hadn't gotten to putting the thought in words): "it suggests hand-held mobility and electronic convenience."