View Single Post
Old 05-18-2010, 10:11 PM   #6
mgmueller
Member Retired
mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mgmueller ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
mgmueller's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,308
Karma: 13024950
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Augsburg (near Munich), Germany
Device: 26 Readers, 44 Tablets
Quote:
Originally Posted by lolivierlol View Post
It seems that NEO is not a good reader for complex PDF because nobody answer !!

Hum, strange ?!

As far as 6" units go, Neo/Boox should be one of the best readers out there.
It has an advanced zoom feature.
Meaning: It doesn't reflow PDFs, which "kills" your layout thus eliminating formulas, graphs and other details like that.
Instead of that, you can zoom by width, by height and other pred-defined set. Or you mark the area of interest with your stylus and explode to full screen.
The latter only is possible on few other units: iRex iLiad, iRex 1000S (iRex 800 with the upcoming firmware update). To some extent, it can be done on Sony's touchscreen units (Sony 600, 700, 900) as well, but only applies for the respective page, not the entire document.

As good as Neo is, in general you can say: The bigger, the better (for complex PDFs). Meaning: 6", in my opinion and experience, is the lower limit for complex PDFs. Personally, I'd recommend >>8".
mgmueller is offline   Reply With Quote