Definitely no need for the personal attacks.
There's for sure no way to know if he answered himself. But I'd assume only he sends e-mails from his official account though--why would a CEO let a lackey send out e-mails in his name?
That's just asking for trouble. It's more likely a case that he just happened to read the e-mail from this blogger for whatever reason--random, new the guy's name etc. and shot off a response in the heat of the moment.
No way to know for sure, but again, I'd be shocked if a CEO was letting a lacky access and send e-mails from their personal account. Especially one so focused on control as Jobs.
|