|
Just chipping in: I've looked through some of his books and read his arguments.
As a historian, they are absolutely terrible. Fun to read I bet but the guy is not only a little loopy (and I'm an open minded guy) but seems incapable of actually building a cohesive argument. In one of his books he basically argues that some natural landmark was created bya liens as some elaborate landing strip or something. His argument? It kind of looks like one.
Yikes. Stay away, except for pure enjoyment.
|