The "home and castle" example is really quite specific, and has an absolutist and bluntly sexist meaning. And the grounds they can refuse you on are entirely relevant when the claim is about their having an absolute right to refuse service, as you stated.
To now go back and state "within the law" is evading the point. You brought up the entire issue, and now I'm going to press it, because you're evading. Calling for unqualified rights to refuse service is not nice, and while I'm certainly not accusing you of being a member of one yourself...but it's the casual usage of that type of language which encourages the "social groups" (like, oh, the BNP) who want it back!
(Unless you are of course, in which case Kish Mein Touchess)
And again, I don't know who the HECK you're talking to with the flight attendant nonsense, it's annoying seeing it in your posts as if you were. And you bitched about politeness! I never suggested I would be, so you cannot possibly be referring to me.
|