View Single Post
Old 04-27-2010, 09:52 AM   #184
jbjb
Somewhat clueless
jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 780
Karma: 10535853
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon View Post
No, it's totally relevant. Because the entire point is that aircraft electronics /are/ shielded, and that shielding needs to be checked and fixed on a more regular basis.

And if you want to claim that city's EM background is negligible, you go right in believing that, I'll stick with the science. A cellphone affecting unshielded cables a meter or so away has no bearing on this.
You really don't get it, do you? *You* made the claim - that the effect of the cellphone's emissions would be less than that of the EM background. I provided a counterexample which shows at least one situation in which it isn't. You're the one making the claim, so you're the one who needs to back it up.

Note that I'm *not* claiming that the city's EM background is negligible.

/JB
jbjb is offline   Reply With Quote