View Single Post
Old 04-26-2010, 09:38 PM   #78
riemann42
Zealot
riemann42 will become famous soon enoughriemann42 will become famous soon enoughriemann42 will become famous soon enoughriemann42 will become famous soon enoughriemann42 will become famous soon enoughriemann42 will become famous soon enough
 
riemann42's Avatar
 
Posts: 121
Karma: 506
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Spokane, WA
Device: eSlick,nook
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sabardeyn View Post
A part of the problem is that while volume of sales will make a difference, what all of these publishers are looking at is how much profit they can make.

So right now, if "Store X" sells an ebook at .05 profit per unit sold x 20 units sold = $1.00. That is much better than, say "Amazon" selling at .01 profit/unit x 70 units = .70 cents. At least, it is for the publishing company.
Interesting.

What was happening is that Amazon was buying a book for $13.00, and selling it for $9.99 at a loss of about $3 for Amazon, and $13.00 of revenue for the Penguin.

Now with the agency model, it goes like this: Amazon brokers the sale of a book on behalf of the Penguin for $14.99. The Penguin pays Amazon a commission of $5.25. Amazon profits $5.25, and the Penguin gets $9.74 of revenue.

Under the old model, say, a 100 people buy the book. That's $1,300 profit for the Penguin and a loss of $300 for Amazon.

Now, 40 people buy the book, and the rest go buy the hardback from Amazon for $9.99 (which is Amazon's way of saying FU to the Penguin). That's $389.60 profit for the Penguin and Amazon's profits are all eaten up by the loss they are taking on the hardback.

In the end, the publisher loses big, but they won a battle, forcing Amazon to charge more for the ebook and fighting the idea of the $9.99 best seller. Clearly it is pyrrhic victory for the evil Penguin, and a big loss for the rest of us.
riemann42 is offline   Reply With Quote