Thread: Seriousness Science Literacy in the U.S.A.
View Single Post
Old 04-19-2010, 02:05 PM   #96
GlennD
Wizard
GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GlennD ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,119
Karma: 17500000
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Pacific NW
Device: sony PRS350, iPhone, iPad
The whole debate over creationism vs. evolution has always kind of bugged me. In my mind, science and religion ask two different questions - science asks "how?", religion asks "why?". Science is based on repeatable observations, religion is based on "the evidence of things not seen".

I believe that God created man - whether He did so by guiding a natural process or by the snap of a divine finger is irrelevant to me. I also believe that He created me with a brain for a reason - He expects me to use it to try to understand His creation as well as I'm able to.

In the end I think that science and religion will intersect, as they are both searching for truth. In the meantime I don't think it's useful to argue over which is "right", they're not incompatible.
GlennD is offline   Reply With Quote