View Single Post
Old 04-19-2010, 06:58 AM   #15
GeoffC
Chocolate Grasshopper ...
GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
GeoffC's Avatar
 
Posts: 27,599
Karma: 20821184
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Scotland
Device: Muse HD , Cybook Gen3 , Pocketbook 302 (Black) , Nexus 10: wife has PW
I had vai-focal lenses for some years, and whilst my near & distance prescription was not too different, I coped. It gave me what I needed. However a couple of years ago it was decided that I needed more strength for reading. From then on I couldn't cope with var-focal lenses - I tend to move my eyes to focus and I could not get used to moving my head to find the small focal point for what I was looking at - much as RCR describes.
Bi-focal lenses are fine, but not ideal; it's harder to draw (for instance) and also read a newspaper - probably one of the drawbacks of growing old(er) - having one eye described as 'lazy' doesn't help my poor brain to interpret what I'm looking at .... I tend to have to sit too close to a PC screen than I ought to ... looking through the 'reading' part of the lenses.....

With time, it ought to get better RCR, mine cost £600 (vari) - so I expect that is a fraction of your cost ! - I'm surprised how expensive bi-focals are too ...
GeoffC is offline   Reply With Quote